MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1992396156 · doi:10.1063/1.1879108

White organic light-emitting diode comprising of blue fluorescence and red phosphorescence

2005· article· en· W1992396156 on OpenAlexaff
Dashan Qin, Ye Tao

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Physics Letters · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOrganic Light-Emitting Diodes Research
Canadian institutionsInstitute for Microstructural Sciences
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhosphorescenceFluorescenceElectroluminescenceIridiumOLEDMaterials sciencePhosphorescent organic light-emitting diodeDiodeLight emissionChemistryPhotochemistryAnalytical Chemistry (journal)OptoelectronicsOpticsPhysicsNanotechnology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A white organic light-emitting diode with the structure of ITO∕NPB30nm∕TCTA+2%TPP20nm∕BCP+0.4%Ir(piq)320nm∕Alq340nm∕Mg:Ag was fabricated and characterized, where 2,5,7,10-tetra-phenylpyrene and tris(1-phenylisoquinoline) iridium (III) [Ir(piq)3] were used as a blue fluorescent dye and a red phosphorescent dye respectively. The I–V characteristics of the device showed a turn-on voltage of 2.6 V. The electroluminescent spectra of the device consisted of blue fluorescent and red phosphorescent emissions. The intensity of the blue emission increased gradually relative to the red emission with increasing voltage. The emissions of the device were in the white-light region between 10 and 15 V. A maximum white light luminance of 1076cd∕m2 with CIE coordinates of (x, y=0.27, 0.24) was reached at 15 V with an efficiency of 1.35cd∕A. The white light emission is related to the simultaneous exciton formation on both sides of the TCTA/BCP interface.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations94
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueApplied Physics LettersSame topicOrganic Light-Emitting Diodes ResearchFrench-language works237,207