Chemical Basis of DNA Sugar−Phosphate Cleavage by Low-Energy Electrons
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
DNA damage by low-energy electrons (LEE) was examined using a novel system in which thin solid films of oligonucleotide tetramers (CGTA and GCAT) were irradiated with monoenergetic electrons (10 eV) under ultrahigh vacuum. The products of irradiation were examined by HPLC. These analyses permitted the quantitation of 16 nonmodified nucleobase, nucleoside, and nucleotide fragments of each tetramer resulting from the cleavage of phosphodiester and N-glycosidic bonds. The distribution of nonmodified products suggests a mechanism of damage involving initial electron attachment to nucleobase moieties, followed by electron transfer to the sugar-phosphate backbone, and subsequent dissociation of the phosphodiester bond. Moreover, virtually all the nonmodified fragments contained a terminal phosphate group at the site of cleavage. These results demonstrate that the phosphodiester bond breaks by a distinct pathway in which the negative charge localizes on the phosphodiester bond giving rise to nonmodified fragments with an intact phosphate group. Conversely, the radical must localize on the sugar moiety to give as yet unidentified modifications. In summary, the reaction of LEE with simple tetramers involved dissociative electron attachment leading to phosphodiester bond cleavage and the formation of nonmodified fragments.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it