MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1992419413 · doi:10.1038/leu.2009.301

FES kinases are required for oncogenic FLT3 signaling

2010· article· en· W1992419413 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Edwige Voisset, Sophie Lopez, A Chaix, Cédric Georges, Katia Hanssens, Thomas Prébet, Patrice Dubreuil, Paulo De Sepulveda

Bibliographic record

VenueLeukemia · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMultiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersInstitut National Du CancerFondation de FranceLigue Contre le CancerInstitute of Cancer ResearchInstitut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale
KeywordsKinaseReceptor tyrosine kinaseCancer researchHaematopoiesisBiologyFms-Like Tyrosine Kinase 3Myeloid leukemiaTyrosine kinaseCellCell cycleCell biologySignal transductionMutationStem cellGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

The three-model screen

all 5,600 screened works →

All three models called this out of scope.

stratum: fund_new · design weight: 1678.90 (the sample is stratified; any rate computed without the weight is wrong)
Claude Opus 4.8OUT
genre: empirical
about Canada: no
confidence: high

FES kinases in oncogenic FLT3 signaling; cancer cell biology.

GPT-5.6 (high)OUT
genre: empirical
about Canada: no
confidence: low

The title indicates a cancer-biology study, not research itself, but the abstract is missing.

Grok 4.5OUT
genre: empirical
about Canada: no
confidence: high

Biomedical paper on FES kinases in oncogenic FLT3 signaling; title is unambiguous domain biology.

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.000

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.334
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations33
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueLeukemiaSame topicMultiple Myeloma Research and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207