MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1992459170 · doi:10.1109/hpcc.2010.107

A Software Self-Organizing Middleware for Smart Spaces Based on Fuzzy Logic

2010· preprint· en· W1992459170 on OpenAlexaff
Charles Gouin-Vallerand, Bessam Abdulrazak, Sylvain Giroux, Mounir Mokhtari

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicModular Robots and Swarm Intelligence
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSoftware deploymentComputer scienceMiddleware (distributed applications)Fuzzy logicAutonomic computingUbiquitous computingSoftwareContext (archaeology)Message oriented middlewareSoftware engineeringDistributed computingHuman–computer interactionSoftware architectureArtificial intelligenceProgramming languageOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Autonomic Computing Self-Configuration /Organization can simplify the complexity of software deployment, management and utilization in pervasive environments such as smart spaces. Software management complexity in pervasive environments is a serious problem, which leads to high management costs and slow down the broad utilization of the pervasive technologies. This paper presents our work on a self-organization middleware that reduce user manipulations and reasoning during software deployment and organization in smart spaces. Our approach is based on Fuzzy Logic and semantic description in order to support the self-organization reasoning on the environment context.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicModular Robots and Swarm IntelligenceFrench-language works237,207