MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1992460693 · doi:10.1055/s-0030-1254638

Underreporting of strictures in the Montreal classification

2010· article· de· W1992460693 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Pavol Papay, Walter Reinisch, Cornelia Gratzer, Wolfgang Miehsler, Clemens Dejaco, H. Vogelsang, Gottfried Novacek

Bibliographic record

VenueZeitschrift für Gastroenterologie · 2010
Typearticle
Languagede
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInflammatory Bowel Disease
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineConcomitantCrohn's diseaseBowel resectionIleumGold standard (test)Inflammatory bowel diseaseSurgeryGastroenterologyDiseaseInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Crohn's disease (CD) is often complicated by a stricturing and/or fistulating phenotype necessitating surgery. Both complications account for the classification of behavior according to the Montreal Classification (MC) in a hierarchic manner which might lead to loss of information about stricture formation in case of concomitant presence of enteral penetration. Methods: The aim of the study was to identify the underreporting of strictures as defined by the MC. A total of 548 consecutive CD patients who consented to participate in a study programme on genetics were included. For each patient, a detailed chart review was performed and disease-specific data were retrospectively collected according to the definitions of the MC and of a validated documentation standard for IBD (IBDIS, Inflammatory Bowel Disease Information System). The behavior of the MC is graduated in B1 non-stricturing non-penetrating, B2 stricturing, and B3 penetrating in a hierarchic manner. As gold standard for rating of the MC the pathohistological and surgical reports of first surgery were used. Perianal fistulas were excluded from this analysis. Results: Data on 318 (58%) patients undergoing surgery (162 females (55%)) with a median age at diagnosis of 25 years (range 7–66 years) and a median time from diagnosis to first intestinal surgery of 29 months (range 0–294) were available. All patients underwent intestinal resections. The most common procedure was ileocoecal resection (n=173; 54%), other locations of resection were the upper gastrointestinal tract (GIT) (n=21; 7%), ileum (n=29; 9%), colon (n=39; 12%), and ileocolon (n=56; 18%). The behaviour was B1 in 17 (5%), B2 in 96 (30%) and B3 in 205 (64%) subjects. However, among patients classified as B3 (penetrating) strictures were described in addition to the penetrating behaviour in 154 (75%) patients whereas penetration without stricture was seen in 51 (25%) patients. Thus, 154 out of 250 (62%) strictures were combined with penetration. Due to the hierarchic manner of the MC the sensitivity to describe a stricture was only 38%, the specificity was 100%, the positive predictive value was 100% and the negative predictive value was 31%. This results in an accuracy of 52% of the MC to reflect the existence of a stricture. Patients with penetration alone had a significantly shorter duration from diagnosis to first surgery (median 10 months; 0–179 months) than patients with both strictures and penetration (31 months; 0–294 months) as well as patients with strictures only (36 months; 0–263 months) (p<0.05). Conclusion: Strictures are often combined with penetration in CD patients undergoing surgery. This leads to underreporting of strictures in the MC and possibly to heterogeneity of the group of patients with B3 with different clinical outcomes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.035
Threshold uncertainty score0.070

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0040.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZeitschrift für GastroenterologieSame topicInflammatory Bowel DiseaseFrench-language works237,207