MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1992466810 · doi:10.1021/cm061709t

Surface Functionalization of Porous Nanostructured Metal Oxide Thin Films Fabricated by Glancing Angle Deposition

2006· article· en· W1992466810 on OpenAlexafffund
Shufen Tsoi, Enrico Fok, Jeremy C. Sit, Jonathan G. C. Veinot

Bibliographic record

VenueChemistry of Materials · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicOptical Coatings and Gratings
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity of Alberta
KeywordsContact angleX-ray photoelectron spectroscopySurface modificationMaterials scienceOxideWettingThin filmChemical engineeringChemical vapor depositionNanotechnologyScanning electron microscopeSiloxanePolymerComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We report the application of solution- and vapor-phase siloxane-based methods for tailoring the surface chemistry/properties of highly porous, nanostructured thin films fabricated using glancing angle deposition (GLAD). The GLAD technique produces high surface area films consisting of isolated columns and provides complete control over the film/column morphology. In the present study, the chemical tunability of a variety of metal oxide GLAD films was investigated using solution-based and vapor-phase surface functionalization methodologies. The surface properties and structures of the treated and untreated films were investigated using scanning electron microscopy (SEM), advancing aqueous contact angle measurements, cyclic voltammetry, and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). Results indicate that the surface chemistry of metal oxide GLAD films could be tailored by either method; however, chemical reactivity depends strongly on the metal oxide film material. Chemical tunability is demonstrated through the covalent tethering of numerous chemical moieties onto the exposed and interior surfaces of metal oxide GLAD films of varied structural motifs. Through careful choice of surface modifier, the present derivatization methods afford a full range of aqueous wettability from hydrophilic to superhydrophobic without compromising film structure. These functionalized, nanoconstructed films demonstrate a high degree of tunability over both structural and surface properties, making them well suited for diverse applications such as optical filters or sensors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.963

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations40
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChemistry of MaterialsSame topicOptical Coatings and GratingsFrench-language works237,207