MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1992468362 · doi:10.1117/12.759473

Effects of functionalized metal and semiconductor nanoparticles in nematic liquid crystal phases

2008· article· en· W1992468362 on OpenAlexaff
Qi Hao, Brandy Kinkead, Torsten Hegmann

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicLiquid Crystal Research Advancements
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLiquid crystalMaterials scienceNanoparticleNanoclustersNanotechnologyNanocrystalLuminescenceTexture (cosmology)Electric fieldSemiconductorQuantum dotOptoelectronics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To capitalize on the unique size and shape-dependent optical and electronic properties of nanoscale particles for liquid crystal (LC) applications, detailed structure and size-property relationship studies are critical. To enhance our understanding of the thermal, optical and electro-optic effects of nanoparticles in nematic LCs we produced numerous different nematic LC mixtures containing small quantities of dispersed metal nanoparticles (i.e. gold and silver nanoclusters) or semiconductor quantum dots (i.e. CdTe nanocrystals) and studied their optical (texture, alignment, defect formation, luminescence) and electro-optic properties. Depending on several experimental parameters such as nanoparticle functionalization and concentration, as well as thermal history in combination with an applied electric field, these nanoparticle/LC mixtures with the nanoparticles differing in surface functionality, size, and core material gave rise to unique alignment effects and electro-optic responses in the two investigated nematic LC (N-LC) hosts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.030
Threshold uncertainty score0.785

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations50
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIESame topicLiquid Crystal Research AdvancementsFrench-language works237,207