MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1992474769 · doi:10.1109/radar.2013.6586153

Limitations of the Singulariy Expansion Method in the characterization of antennas

2013· article· en· W1992474769 on OpenAlexaff
amien Rialet, ahia M. M. Antar, ichel Clenet

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectromagnetic Compatibility and Measurements
Canadian institutionsDefence Research and Development CanadaRoyal Military College of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDirectional antennaImpulse responseAntenna (radio)Computer scienceReconfigurable antennaImpulse (physics)Frequency domainElectronic engineeringDipole antennaTime domainAcousticsPhysicsAntenna efficiencyTelecommunicationsEngineeringMathematicsMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper reports on a technique based on the Singularity Expansion Method (SEM) to completely characterize antennas. This technique provides a full model of the Antenna Transfer Function (ATF) in the frequency domain or the Antenna Impulse Response (AIR) in the time domain based on a set of few parameters. However, some limitations are noted in the physical interpretation of these results. Performance and limitations of this approach are examined for two different antennas: a monopole and an Ultra-Wide Band (UWB) antenna.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.777
Threshold uncertainty score0.083

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicElectromagnetic Compatibility and MeasurementsFrench-language works237,207