Ultrastructure of the host-parasite interaction in leaves of <i>Duchesnea indica</i> infected by the rust fungus <i>Frommeëla mexicana</i> var. <i>indicae</i> as revealed by high pressure freezing
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A combination of scanning and transmission electron microscopy was used to examine the host-pathogen relationship in leaves of Duchesnea indica (Andrz) Focke infected by the rust fungus Frommeëla mexicana var. indicae McCain & Hennen. Samples for transmission electron microscopy were prepared using high pressure freezing followed by freeze substitution. This protocol provided excellent preservation of both host cells and fungal haustoria. Each haustorium of F. mexicana var. indicae possessed a long slender neck with a neck band and an expanded body that contained two nuclei positioned close together. The haustorial body was lobed and sometimes even branched but lacked septa. Details of the extrahaustorial membrane that separated each haustorium from the cytoplasm of its host cell were particularly well preserved. Extensive labyrinth cell wall ingrowths developed around haustorial necks, as well as elsewhere, in infected cells. These ingrowths appeared to be identical to those present in plant transfer cells. Transfer cells are thought to be involved in intensive solute transfer over short distances. This appears to be the first report of the development of transfer cells in response to infection by a plant pathogenic fungus.Key words: haustoria, transfer cells, freeze substitution, electron microscopy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".