MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1992491299 · doi:10.1109/icassp.2013.6637889

Singular point detection based on orientation filed regularization and poincaré index in fingerprint images

2013· article· en· W1992491299 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicBiometric Identification and Security
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtificial intelligenceOrientation (vector space)Fingerprint (computing)Regularization (linguistics)Pattern recognition (psychology)Singular point of a curveFingerprint recognitionComputer visionComputer scienceMathematicsSpurious relationshipHelmholtz free energyGeometryPhysicsStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Detection of singular points (SPs) in fingerprint images is an important task in fingerprint recognition. In this paper, we propose a novel technique for SPs detection using orientation field regularization and the Poincaré Index (PI) technique. The squared orientation field is first extracted from a fingerprint image. In order to distinguish the local orientation patterns of genuine SPs from that of spurious SPs, a novel technique based on the Discrete Hodge Helmholtz Decomposition (DHHD) is proposed to reconstruct a regular orientation field of the fingerprint. Based on the regular orientation field, the PI technique is then applied to extract the SPs. Experimental results on the public fingerprint database FVC2002 show that, the proposed technique is rather accurate and robust in identifying SPs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.841
Threshold uncertainty score0.394

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicBiometric Identification and SecurityFrench-language works237,207