Shear strength characteristics of an unsaturated expansive clay
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The shear strength characteristics of an expansive clay from China were studied by performing suction-controlled direct shear tests on both natural and compacted specimens. The tested soil was a silty clay with intermediate plasticity and medium expansion potential. A modified direct shear apparatus with a newly developed water volume indicator was used for this laboratory study. The experimental results clearly show that the dilatancy of the expansive clay increases with an increase in the applied suction for both the natural and compacted specimens. Matric suction contributes to the shear strength of the expansive clay via two different mechanisms: the contribution of capillary force to interparticle normal stress, and the effect of suction on soil dilatancy. As a result of the second mechanism, the contribution of suction to peak shear strength for the clay is more significant than that to post-failure shear strength, particularly at a high suction range. The contribution of suction to post-failure shear strength for the natural specimen is basically consistent with that for the compacted specimen. The higher peak shear strength and dilatancy for the natural specimen are related to the cementation effect of the iron and manganese oxides. The contribution of suction to shear strength for the compacted expansive clay is more significant than that for a compacted kaolin at suctions less than 100 kPa.Key words: expansive clay, matric suction, shear strength, dilatancy, direct shear test, water content.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".