Arrangement of Subunits in the Proteolipid Ring of the V-ATPase
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The vacuolar ATPases (V-ATPases) are multisubunit complexes containing two domains. The V(1) domain (subunits A-H) is peripheral and carries out ATP hydrolysis. The V(0) domain (subunits a, c, c', c'', d, and e) is membrane-integral and carries out proton transport. In yeast, there are three proteolipid subunits as follows: subunit c (Vma3p), subunit c' (Vma11p), and subunit c'' (Vma16p). The proteolipid subunits form a six-membered ring containing single copies of subunits c' and c'' and four copies of subunit c. To determine the possible arrangements of proteolipid subunits in V(0) that give rise to a functional V-ATPase complex, a series of gene fusions was constructed to constrain the arrangement of pairs of subunits in the ring. Fusions containing c'' employed a truncated version of this protein lacking the first putative transmembrane helix (which we have shown previously to be functional), to ensure that the N and C termini of all subunits were located on the luminal side of the membrane. Fusion constructs were expressed in strains disrupted in c', c'', or both but containing a wild copy of c to ensure the presence of the required number of copies of subunit c. The c-c''(DeltaTM1), c''(DeltaTM1)-c', and c'-c constructs all complemented the vma(-) phenotype and gave rise to complexes possessing greater than 25% of wild-type levels of activity. By contrast, neither the c-c', the c'-c''(DeltaTM1), nor the c''(DeltaTM1)-c constructs complemented the vma(-) phenotype. These results suggest that functionally assembled V-ATPase complexes contain the proteolipid subunits arranged in a unique order in the ring.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".