MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1992532480 · doi:10.1159/000137489

Distribution of Muscarinic Receptors in the Digestive Tract Organs

2008· article· en· W1992532480 on OpenAlexafffund
J. Morisset, L. Geoffnon, Louise Larose, J. Lan ouml e, Guy G. Poirier

Bibliographic record

VenuePharmacology · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicReceptor Mechanisms and Signaling
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
FundersMedical Research Council CanadaF. Hoffmann-La Roche
KeywordsMuscarinic acetylcholine receptorQuinuclidinyl BenzilateEndocrinologyAntrumInternal medicineMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M1ReceptorPopulationBiologyMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M2Muscarinic antagonistPirenzepineAntagonistStomachChemistryBiochemistryMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We have studied the binding of the potent muscarinic antagonist, (3H)-quinuclidinyl benzilate [(3H)-QNB], in order to characterize muscarinic receptors of the digestive tract organs and evaluate their population. In each tissue examined, the binding sites were saturable and stereoselective; (3H)-QNB could also be displaced by known muscarinic agonists and antagonists. Along the digestive tract, the stomach (for stomach, fundus, antrum) and the colon possess the highest number of binding sites while the secretory (parotid, mandibular and pancreas), with a comparable amount of sites, are among those with less receptors. This study presents for the first time a complete distribution of the muscarinic receptors in organs of the digestive system evaluated under identical experimental conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.036
Threshold uncertainty score0.253

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations35
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePharmacologySame topicReceptor Mechanisms and SignalingFrench-language works237,207