MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1992552439 · doi:10.3917/gs.102.0127

Le vieillissement des travailleurs et le processus de réinsertion professionnelle

2002· article· fr· W1992552439 on OpenAlexaffabout
Louise Saint-Arnaud, M. Saint-Jean

Bibliographic record

VenueGérontologie et société · 2002
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldHealth Professions
TopicWorkplace Health and Well-being
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceSociologyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Le but de cet article est d’apporter un éclairage sur les différents facteurs impliqués dans le processus de désinsertion et de réinsertion professionnelle des travailleurs vieillissants. À partir de données colligées auprès d’employés des secteurs de la santé et des services sociaux, de l’éducation et de la fonction publique du Québec, cette étude compare le profil et l’issue du processus de désinsertion et de réinsertion professionnelle de travailleurs âgés de 50 ans et plus, à ceux de travailleurs âgés de moins de 50 ans, qui ont connu une absence prolongée en raison d’un problème de santé mentale. Les résultats de cette étude rendent compte de la nécessité de questionner l’organisation du travail et ses impacts sur la dynamique des rapports sociaux de travail pour mieux comprendre les facteurs impliqués dans le processus de désinsertion professionnelle et d’exclusion des travailleurs vieillissants.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.083
Threshold uncertainty score0.164

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.004
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.083
GPT teacher head0.414
Teacher spread0.331 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGérontologie et sociétéSame topicWorkplace Health and Well-beingFrench-language works237,207