Computational Study of the Effects of Shock Waves on Film Cooling Effectiveness
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The performance of a louver cooling scheme on a transonic airfoil has been studied numerically in this paper. Film cooling holes are located near the passage throat. The Mach number at the location of the jet exit is close to unity. A comparison of film cooling effectiveness between numerical prediction and experimental data for a circular hole shows that the numerical procedures are adequate. In addition to the shock-wave effects and compressibility, curvature effect was also studied by comparing cooling effectiveness on the airfoil surface with that on a flat plate. Substantially higher cooling effectiveness for the louver cooling scheme on the airfoil was predicted at blowing ratios below 1 in comparison to other cooling configurations. At higher blowing ratios than 2 the advantages of the louver cooling scheme become less obvious. It was also found that for the same cooling configuration the cooling effectiveness on the transonic airfoil is slightly higher than that on a flat plate at moderately low blowing ratios below 1. At high blowing ratios above 2 when the oblique shock becomes detached from the leading edge of the hole exits, dramatic reduction in cooling effectiveness occurs as a result of boundary layer separation due to the strong shock waves. A coolant-blockage and shaped-wedge similarity was proposed and found to be able to qualitatively explain this phenomenon satisfactorily.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".