Clustering Relational Database Entities Using K-means
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The fast evolution of hardware and the internet made large volumes of data more accessible. This data is composed of heterogeneous data types such as text, numbers, multimedia, and others. Non-overlapping research communities work on processing homogeneous data types. Nevertheless, from the user perspective, these heterogeneous data types should behave and be accessed in a similar fashion. Processing heterogeneous data types, which is Heterogeneous Data Mining (HDM), is a complex task. However, the HDM by Unified Vectorization (HDM-UV) seems to be an appropriate solution for this problem because it permits to process the heterogeneous data types simultaneously. In this paper, we use K-means and Self-Organizing Maps for simultaneously processing textual and numerical data types by UV. We evaluate how the HDM-UV improves the clustering results of these two algorithms (SOM, K-means) by comparing them to the traditional homogeneous data processing. Furthermore, we compare the clustering results of the two algorithms applied to a data integration problem.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it