MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1992576639 · doi:10.1139/z04-105

Pivotal range and thermosensitive period of the pig-nosed turtle, <i>Carettochelys insculpta</i> (Testudines: Carettochelydidae), from northern Australia

2004· article· en· W1992576639 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Jeanne E. Young, Arthur Georges, J. Sean Doody, Peter West, Rachael Alderman

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Zoology · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicTurtle Biology and Conservation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTurtle (robot)BiologyPeriod (music)Range (aeronautics)ZoologyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Understanding temperature-dependent sex determination in nature often depends on knowledge of species-specific attributes that are integrated into the relationship between temperature and sex. We determined two such attributes for the pig-nosed turtle, Carettochelys insculpta Ramsay, 1886, in tropical Australia: the pivotal range in temperature that separates the male-producing domain from the female-producing domain, and the thermosensitive period during which the embryonic sex is influenced by temperature. The pivotal range for C. insculpta was very narrow, spanning only about 1 °C, and was centered on 32 °C, which is high but consistent with temperatures reported for other tropical species. The thermosensitive period spanned developmental stages 17–21 for temperature influence in the direction of maleness and 18–21 for temperature influence in the direction of femaleness. This period is slightly narrower than that for other reptile species but broadly consistent with the middle third of incubation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.035

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.193
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Zoology→Same topicTurtle Biology and Conservation→French-language works237,207→