MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1992580816 · doi:10.1089/thy.2008.0386

Body Mass Index in the Evaluation of Thyroid Cancer Risk

2009· article· en· W1992580816 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueThyroid · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicThyroid Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsMcGill University Health CentreJewish General HospitalMontreal General HospitalMcGill University
FundersMcGill University
KeywordsMedicineUnderweightOverweightBody mass indexMalignancyThyroid cancerObesityCancerPopulationThyroid nodulesThyroidInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Obesity has been linked to numerous diseases including thyroid cancer, but the exact nature of the relationship, especially with respect to patients with thyroid nodules, remains unclear. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of body mass index (BMI) on thyroid cancer risk in a population of patients with indeterminate cytology on fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB). METHODS: A total of 253 consecutive patients with indeterminate thyroid nodule FNABs who underwent total thyroidectomy in a tertiary care teaching hospital between 2002 and 2007 were reviewed. Height and weight reported on the anesthesia summary were recorded for each patient. Malignancy rates were calculated for the underweight, normal, overweight, and obese groups stratified according to their BMI. Subanalyses according to age and sex were also performed. RESULTS: The risk of malignancy tended to be lower in obese patients compared to patients with BMIs in the underweight, normal, and overweight ranges (52% vs. 61%, p = 0.195). In men, a BMI classified as obese was associated with a significantly lower rate of malignancy (36% vs. 72%, p = 0.003). Women older than 45 years were a subgroup in which higher malignancy rates were associated with obesity (65% vs. 54%, p = 0.293). Conversely, in men over the age of 45 years and women under 45 years, a BMI in the obesity range was linked to a lower incidence of malignancy (20% vs. 68% p = 0.009 and 36% vs. 68% p = 0.043, respectively). When older women were excluded from the population studied, the rate of malignancy in obese patients was 36% versus 70% in nonobese patients (p = 0.002) with an associated reduction of 5% in the risk of malignancy per increased unit of BMI. CONCLUSIONS: For patients with FNAB results of indeterminate significance, a higher BMI correlates with lower rates of thyroid malignancy for all patients except women over the age of 45 years.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.223
Threshold uncertainty score0.395

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.340
Teacher spread0.311 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it