Theoretical studies on ClOO — electronic spectra, ionization potential, and electron affinity
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Vertical excitation energies and oscillator strengths of doublet and quartet states of ClOO, covering doublet states up to 7.5 eV and quartet states up to 9 eV, were obtained by multireference configuration interaction calculations. Strong absorptions from the X2A″ ground state are predicted at 186 and 235 nm. Experimentally, a maximum has been found near 248 nm. The grouping of excited states, with twelve low-lying doublet states and three low-lying quartet states, is explained by the interaction of the 2P ground state of Cl with the π*2 states 3Σg–, 1Δg, and 1Σg+ of O2. Potential energy curves for Cl–O separation at fixed O–O distance and ClOO angle show the lower states to be repulsive (with the exception of the ground state), and higher states to have minima due to avoided crossings. The lowest Rydberg states are expected around 8.5 eV. Adiabatic ionization potentials (IP) and electron affinities (EA) of ClOO were obtained by density functional and coupled cluster methods, with values of 11.60–11.79 eV for IP and 3.56–3.79 eV for EA.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".