Bibliographic record
Abstract
Wei Qian, Yi Yang & Hui ZouWei Qian is Assistant Professor, School of Mathematical Sciences, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY 14623 (E-mail: wxqsma@rit.edu). Yi Yang is Assistant Professor, Department of Mathematics and Statistics, McGill University, Canada (E-mail: yi.yang6@mcgill.ca) Hui Zou is Professor of Statistics, School of Statistics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455 (E-mail: zouxx019@umn.edu).Tweedie’s compound Poisson model is a popular method to model data with probability mass at zero and nonnegative, highly right-skewed distribution. Motivated by wide applications of the Tweedie model in various fields such as actuarial science, we investigate the grouped elastic net method for the Tweedie model in the context of the generalized linear model. To efficiently compute the estimation coefficients, we devise a two-layer algorithm that embeds the blockwise majorization descent method into an iteratively reweighted least square strategy. Integrated with the strong rule, the proposed algorithm is implemented in an easy-to-use R package HDtweedie, and is shown to compute the whole solution path very efficiently. Simulations are conducted to study the variable selection and model fitting performance of various lasso methods for the Tweedie model. The modeling applications in risk segmentation of insurance business are illustrated by analysis of an auto insurance claim dataset. Supplementary materials for this article are available online.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.013 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".