MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1992604414 · doi:10.1109/vtcf.2006.101

Spectral Efficiency and User Diversity Gains Through Cooperative Fixed Relays

2006· article· en· W1992604414 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Vehicular Technology Conference · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCooperative Communication and Network Coding
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRelayComputer scienceComputer networkSoftware deploymentWirelessIncentiveCooperative diversityWireless networkComputer securityDiversity (politics)Telecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cooperative diversity through mobile terminals is faced with a number of deployment challenges such as security (as terminals have to detect partner's signals), incentive and coercion packages (as users have to be motivated to use their terminals to assist others), and huge capital investment (as terminals have to be modified to make them ready for cooperation). This paper discusses fixed relay-enabled user cooperation that are being considered in the WINNER project for deploying beyond 3G wireless communication networks. The schemes operate by engaging two users in cooperation without their knowledge. The schemes which can be viewed as an add-on to network facility have significant impact on the costs, security and end-to-end (E2E) performance of two-hop wireless networks. In addition, the proposed schemes can be used in a number of networks since current terminals do not require any modifications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.882
Threshold uncertainty score0.796

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it