The benefits of exposure therapy alone may last longer than sertraline alone or sertraline plus exposure therapy in social phobia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Haug TT, Blomhoff S, Hellstrom K et al. Exposure therapy and sertraline in social phobia: 1-year follow up of a randomised control trial. Br J Psychiatry2003 , Apr; 182 : 312 –8. [OpenUrl][1][Abstract/FREE Full Text][2] QUESTION: Do the benefits of exposure therapy and sertraline for social phobia last after treatment has ceased? Randomised controlled trial with allocation concealment. Physicians and patients were blind to pharmacological treatment allocation (but not psychosocial treatment). Norway and Sweden; timeframe not specified. 375 people aged 18–65 years with generalised social phobia of at least 1 year duration (DSM-IV criteria) rated as moderately ill (score of 4 or greater on overall severity item of the Clinical Global Impression - Social Phobia scale, severity sub-scale). Participants were recruited from 41 primary care centres in Norway and Sweden and from advertisements in newspapers and other media. 61% were female; mean age was 40 years; mean age at symptom onset was 16 years; mean duration of illness was 24 years. People with comorbid dysthymia or … [1]: {openurl}?query=rft.jtitle%253DThe%2BBritish%2BJournal%2Bof%2BPsychiatry%26rft.stitle%253DBr.%2BJ.%2BPsychiatry%26rft.aulast%253DHAUG%26rft.auinit1%253DT.%2BT.%26rft.volume%253D182%26rft.issue%253D4%26rft.spage%253D312%26rft.epage%253D318%26rft.atitle%253DExposure%2Btherapy%2Band%2Bsertraline%2Bin%2Bsocial%2Bphobia%253A%2BI-year%2Bfollow-up%2Bof%2Ba%2Brandomised%2Bcontrolled%2Btrial%26rft_id%253Dinfo%253Adoi%252F10.1192%252Fbjp.182.4.312%26rft_id%253Dinfo%253Apmid%252F12668406%26rft.genre%253Darticle%26rft_val_fmt%253Dinfo%253Aofi%252Ffmt%253Akev%253Amtx%253Ajournal%26ctx_ver%253DZ39.88-2004%26url_ver%253DZ39.88-2004%26url_ctx_fmt%253Dinfo%253Aofi%252Ffmt%253Akev%253Amtx%253Actx [2]: /lookup/ijlink?linkType=ABST&journalCode=bjprcpsych&resid=182/4/312&atom=%2Febmental%2F6%2F3%2F90.atom
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".