CLASSIFICATION OF SKIN AUTOFLUORESCENCE SPECTRUM USING SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE IN TYPE 2 DIABETES SCREENING
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Advanced glycation end products (AGEs) are a complex and heterogeneous group of compounds that have been implicated in diabetes related complifications. Skin autofluorescence was recently introduced as an alternative tool for skin AGEs accumulation assessment in diabetes. Successful optical diagnosis of diabetes requires a rapid and accurate classification algorithm. In order to improve the performance of noninvasive and optical diagnosis of type 2 diabetes, support vector machines (SVM) algorithm was implemented for the classification of skin autofluorescence from diabetics and control subjects. Cross-validation and grid-optimization methods were employed to calculate the optimal parameters that maximize classification accuracy. Classification model was set up according to the training set and then verified by the testing set. The results show that radical basis function is the best choice in the four common kernels in SVM. Moreover, a diagnostic accuracy of 82.61%, a sensitivity of 69.57%, and a specificity of 95.65% for discriminating diabetics from control subjects were achieved using a mixed kernel function, which is based on liner kernel function and radical basis function. In comparison with fasting plasma glucose and HbA 1c test, the classification method of skin autofluorescence spectrum based on SVM shows great potential in screening of diabetes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".