MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1992634842 · doi:10.1353/utq.0.0385

Language Experience in Second Language Speech Learning: In Honor of James Emil Flege (review)

2009· article· en· W1992634842 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Jeffrey Steele

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of Toronto Quarterly · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLinguistic Variation and Morphology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHonorStress (linguistics)LinguisticsPerceptionSet (abstract data type)PsychologyComputer sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Language Experience in Second Language Speech Learning: In Honor of James Emil Flege Jeffrey Steele (bio) Ocke-Schwen Bohn and Murray J. Munro, editors. Language Experience in Second Language Speech Learning: In Honor of James Emil Flege. John Benjamins. xviii, 408. US $155.00 It has been over a decade since Winifred Strange’s edited volume Speech Perception and Linguistic Experience: Issues in Cross-Language Research was published, providing a rich and authoritative overview of non-native speech research. Accordingly, the present volume, which builds on the same themes while introducing new research areas and experimental methodologies, is extremely timely and welcome. The volume also serves as a Festschrift to James Flege, one of the founders of the field of L2 speech learning. The volume contains nineteen separately authored chapters organized under five themes. The first of these, ‘The Nature of L2 Speech Learning,’ includes four papers on theoretical frameworks (Catherine T. Best and Michael D. Tyler), methodology (Winifred Strange), and the roles of attention, training, and linguistic experience on perception (Susan G. Guion and Eric Pederson; Elaina M. Frieda and Takeshi Nozawa). Strange’s contribution, which proposes a set of empirically based ways to define ‘cross-language (L1/L2) similarity,’ will be of particular interest to all speech researchers. [End Page 151] The three papers grouped under ‘The Concept of Foreign Accent’ investigate ultimate attainment (Birdsong), and L2 learners’ use of different input types (Robert Allen Fox and Julie Tovis McGory; Allard Jongman and Travis Wade). Fox and McGory’s study is novel in examining similarities and differences in the perception and production of different dialects. By studying Japanese speakers learning Standard American versus Southern American English, he demonstrates that both groups’ perception and production is better attuned to the standard variety and, thus, that L2 learners may fail to acquire micro-variation even when provided with sufficient linguistic exposure. The contributions in ‘Consonants and Vowels’ focus on the most widely investigated issues in L2 speech research: the production (Robert McAllister; Yue Wang and Dawn Behne) and perception (Anna Marie Schmidt; Ratree P. Wayland) of vowels and consonants. McAllister and Wang and Behne’s studies demonstrate in detail how L2 phonetic systems are inter-languages characterized by properties intermediate to the L1 and target language systems. The other two contributions build on our understanding of non-native perception in acoustic cue weighting (Schmidt) and the relationship between discrimination and identification, including the effects of task type and stimuli presentation (Wayland). In ‘Beyond Consonants and Vowels,’ one finds much novel research. In the first chapter of this section, Gottfried questions whether high-level musical training favours acuity in the perception of non-native tone. The following two chapters (Joan A. Sereno and Yue Wang; Denis Burnham and Karen Mattock) also focus on tone. Whereas Burnham and Wang provide a comprehensive overview of research on both L1 and L2 tonal perception, Sereno and Wang’s work introduces the use of neuro-imaging. These researchers demonstrate that adult speech learning involves observable changes in neural structure and can be shaped by training. This section concludes with Katsura Aoyama and Susan G. Guion’s study of cross-linguistic influence and development in Japanese-speaking learners’ acquisition of English prosody. The final grouping of papers, ‘Emerging Issues,’ includes four chapters with themes related to those of the rest of the volume. Thorsten Piske seeks to use the findings of L2 speech research on age of acquisition, quantity and quality of input, and training to inform pedagogical practice. The following chapter (Amanda C. Walley) examines the relationships between developing L1 and L2 linguistic competence, including speech perception and word recognition. In the third chapter of this section, Tessa Bent, Anna R. Bradlow and Bruce Smith continue with L2 speech and comprehension focusing on overall L2 speech intelligibility. These authors demonstrate that errors in vowel realization and errors in initial syllables have the greatest effect on non-native speech intelligibility. In the final chapter, Port addresses the fundamental question of the nature of the basic units of [End Page 152] speech as well as the role of literacy in shaping researchers’ previous answers to this question. In summary, this volume represents the state-of...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.104
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity of Toronto QuarterlySame topicLinguistic Variation and MorphologyFrench-language works237,207