MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Outbreak of pseudomonas aeruginosa by multiple organ transplantation from a common donor1

2003· article· en· W1992644226 on OpenAlexaff
Deepali Kumar, Mark S. Cattral, Ari Robicsek, Christiane Gaudreau, Atul Humar

Bibliographic record

VenueTransplantation · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAntibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
Canadian institutionsToronto General HospitalUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBacteremiaMedicinePseudomonas aeruginosaPneumoniaKidneyKidney transplantationSepsisLungMicrobiologyInternal medicineBiologyAntibioticsBacteria

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Transmission of bacterial infections from donor to recipient may occur with donor bacteremia. We describe a novel mechanism for transmission of Pseudomonas to multiple recipients through direct contamination of a donor innominate artery graft. Patient data were collected by chart review from the donor and the kidney, kidney-pancreas, heart, lung, and liver recipients. The donor was not bacteremic but had P. aeruginosa isolated from routine tracheal cultures. Spillage of tracheal contents onto the innominate artery and subsequent contamination of intra-abdominal organs likely occurred. Vascular anastomotic infections with graft loss caused by Pseudomonas occurred in three patients (liver, kidney, and kidney-pancreas), and the lung patient developed severe pneumonia. All Pseudomonas isolates were identical by molecular typing. Donors may transmit bacterial infections to multiple recipients by mechanisms other than donor bacteremia. Although donor tracheal cultures are commonly positive, in certain settings antimicrobial treatment of recipients may be needed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations27
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransplantationSame topicAntibiotic Resistance in BacteriaFrench-language works237,207