Gastric Metaplasia: A Frequently Overlooked Feature of Duodenal Biopsy Specimens in Untreated Celiac Disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Duodenal gastric metaplasia is rarely reported in untreated celiac disease, although it is seen in 60% to 100% of duodenal biopsy specimens in nonceliac patients with histologic duodenitis. The low incidence could represent underreporting, a decreased incidence in pediatric patients generally, or the more distal sampling site that is customary for most biopsy specimens that are obtained to diagnose celiac disease. It could also be a unique feature of the inflammatory reaction that characterizes this disease. The purpose of this study was to examine the incidence of gastric metaplasia in duodenal specimens from children with untreated celiac disease with special reference to patient age and biopsy site. METHOD: Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded specimens of duodenal mucosa were selected from the pathology department's archival material. Sections were either stained histochemically or by immunochemical methods, according to an antigen-retrieval protocol. Forty-four duodenal specimens from untreated patients with celiac disease (n = 22) and control subjects of similar age with normal histology (n = 22) were examined. Ten of each were obtained during upper endoscopy from the proximal duodenum (proximal site) and 12 of each by Crosby capsule near the ligament of Treitz (distal site). RESULTS: All specimens from patients with celiac disease exhibited marked villous atrophy. None had been noted to have gastric metaplasia during routine examination of sections stained by hematoxylin and eosin. Fifteen (68%) of 22 of the celiac specimens and 2 of 22 (9%) control specimens contained gastric metaplasia, identified as patches of gastric-type cells containing MUC5AC (gastric mucin), pS2 (gastric trefoil factor) and neutral (periodic acid-Schiff-positive) mucin. Five of the seven celiac specimens that had no metaplasia showed increased numbers of goblet cells expressing gastric markers. The incidence of gastric metaplasia was not different for endoscopic (70%) or capsule (67%) specimens. Sixty-eight percent (7/11) of patients aged less than 3 years had gastric metaplasia. CONCLUSION: The presence of gastric metaplasia has been previously underreported in celiac disease specimens. Detection would be improved by the routine use of period acid-Schiff/ alcian blue staining. The incidence of gastric metaplasia in celiac disease is not significantly influenced by biopsy site or age at time of the biopsy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".