Gain-Scheduled $\ell _{1}$ -Optimal Control of Variable-Speed-Variable-Pitch Wind Turbines
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The fast-growing technology of large scale wind turbines demands control systems capable of enhancing both the efficiency of capturing wind power, and the useful life of the turbines themselves. l <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">1</sub> -Optimal control is an approach to deal with persistent exogenous disturbances which have bounded magnitude (l <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">∞</sub> -norm) such as realistic wind disturbances and turbulence profiles. In this brief, we develop an efficient method to compute the l <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">1</sub> -norm of a system. As the control synthesis problem is nonconvex, we use the proposed method to design the optimal output feedback controllers for a linear model of a wind turbine at different operating points using genetic algorithm optimization. The locally optimized controllers are interpolated using a gain-scheduled technique with guaranteed stability. The controller is tested with comprehensive simulation studies on a 5 MW wind turbine using fatigue, aerodynamics, structures, and turbulence (FAST) software. The proposed controller is compared with a well-tuned proportional-integral (PI) controller. The results show improved power quality, and decrease in the fluctuations of generator torque and rotor speed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it