MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1992689998 · doi:10.1109/tpel.2013.2289916

A TRIAC Dimmable Single-Switch Electronic Ballast With Power Factor Correction and Lamp Power Regulation

2014· article· en· W1992689998 on OpenAlexaff
John Lam, Praveen Jain

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Power Electronics · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced DC-DC Converters
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDimmerPower factorTRIACBallastIncandescent light bulbFluorescent lampElectrical engineeringEngineeringDuty cycleSwitched-mode power supplyAC powerVoltagePower (physics)Constant power circuitPower controlPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With the global concerns on the issue of how to conserve the limited energy resources, compact fluorescent lamps (CFLs) have been forced in a lot of countries to replace the power-hungry incandescent lamps to reduce the energy cost. However, conventional passive power factor corrected electronic ballasts used in CFLs suffer two major drawbacks: 1) they are unable to achieve close-to-unity power factor and 2) they are unable to provide the same amount of light intensity under fluctuating line voltage. This paper proposed a simple lamp power regulation method for a very high-power factor single-switch electronic ballast, which allows the electronic ballast to maintain almost constant lamp power at its full-power condition for a wide range of the input voltage by controlling the dc-link voltage of the ballast power circuit through duty ratio control. When a TRIAC phase-cut dimmer is used to dim the CFL, the dc-link voltage regulation control loop is deactivated; so that the lamp power decreases accordingly during dimming. The analysis and operating principles of the controller are discussed in this paper. MATLAB, PSIM simulation, and experimental results are provided to highlight the merits of the proposed work.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.176
Teacher spread0.172 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Power ElectronicsSame topicAdvanced DC-DC ConvertersFrench-language works237,207