MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1992718391 · doi:10.1021/ac991395b

Determination of Distribution Constants between a Liquid Polymeric Coating and Water by a Solid-Phase Microextraction Technique with a Flow-Through Standard Water System

2000· article· en· W1992718391 on OpenAlexaff
Bryn Shurmer, Janusz Pawliszyn

Bibliographic record

VenueAnalytical Chemistry · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicAnalytical chemistry methods development
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryDissolutionCoatingSolid-phase microextractionExtraction (chemistry)Tap waterAnalytePolymerAnalytical Chemistry (journal)ChromatographyDetection limitPrecipitationPhase (matter)Standard solutionGas chromatography–mass spectrometryOrganic chemistryMass spectrometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper describes an optimized experimental system for determining water/polymer coating distribution constants and discusses the mechanism of extraction of high molecular weight compounds by poly(dimethylsiloxane) (PDMS). The proposed flow-through standard water generator eliminates errors associated with both losses of analytes to the system surfaces and limited sample volume. In addition, the errors caused by partial precipitation or poor dissolution of highly hydrophobic analytes during spiking of water when producing calibration standards are also eliminated. The target analytes are a range of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). The results demonstrate that absorption partitioning is the predominant mechanism of extraction of analytes into PDMS-coated fibers for all PAHs investigated regardless of molecular weight. There is a strong correlation between determined PDMS/water distribution constants (K(fw)) and literature K(ow) values for all PAHs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.223
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations55
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnalytical ChemistrySame topicAnalytical chemistry methods developmentFrench-language works237,207