MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Dopamine D2 receptors internalize in their low-affinity state

2002· article· en· W1992719972 on OpenAlexaff
Françoise Ko, Philip Seeman, Wen-shan Sun, Shitij Kapur

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuroreport · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicReceptor Mechanisms and Signaling
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDopamine receptor D2InternalizationSulpirideDopamineDopamine receptorReceptorChemistryD2-like receptorEndocrinologyInternal medicineDopamine receptor D1BiologyBiochemistryAntagonistMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The present study was done in order to determine whether dopamine internalizes D2 receptors in CHO cells and whether the high-affinity or the low-affinity state of the dopamine D2 receptor is associated with dopamine-induced internalization of dopamine D2 receptors. Using [3H]sulpiride to label D2Long receptors in CHO cells, it was found that dopamine lowered the binding of [3H]sulpiride by 20%. Although the high-affinity states of D2 were converted to low-affinity states by guanine nucleotide, the latter had no effect in blocking the dopamine-induced reduction in [3H]sulpiride binding, indicating that the dopamine-induced internalization of D2 receptors occurred with D2 in the low-affinity state.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.059
Threshold uncertainty score0.750

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations28
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuroreportSame topicReceptor Mechanisms and SignalingFrench-language works237,207