MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1992742780 · doi:10.2495/dne-v5-n3-242-253

Constructal theory of plate tectonics

2010· article· en· W1992742780 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
S. Quéré

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Design & Nature and Ecodynamics · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
Topicearthquake and tectonic studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeometryVorticityLithosphereToroidGeologyPhysicsConvectionMantle convectionGeophysicsVortexMechanicsTectonicsMathematicsSeismologyPlasma

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Labeled 'the all-time breakthrough in geology', plate tectonics brought a revolution in Earth Science 40 years ago.This theory links movements of lithospheric plates to processes taking place deep inside the Earth.The assumption of rigid surface plates enables one to describe the surface kinematics in terms of two components: the horizontal divergence (ridge-trench system) and the radial vorticity (transform faults and plate spin).The horizontal divergence and the radial vorticity are directly related to the poloidal (vertical motion around a lateral axis) and toroidal (lateral motion around a vertical axis) scalar fields, respectively.Surprisingly, kinetic energy in present-day plate motions is partitioned approximately equally between horizontal divergence (poloidal) and radial vorticity (toroidal) parts.I work with a time-dependant 3D spherical convective code where plates are coupled dynamically to the mantle.This method, which ensures the retrieval (to within ±10%) of the main global observables at the Earth's surface (mean plate velocity, global heat flux and potential temperature under oceanic ridges), is unique and provides new opportunities to tackle questions such as the coupling between plates and the deeper mantle.I made experiments with different plate geometry on top of the 3D spherical code.When I plot the degree variance of the poloidal and toroidal components of the surface velocity field, only a geometry close the observed presentday geometry shows almost the same toroidal to poloidal ratio that exists at present-day.It suggests that only a geometry close to the one which is observed at present-day can reproduce an equipartition between the poloidal and toroidal components of plate motions.Further, O'Connell et al. (Toroidal-poloidal partitioning of lithospheric plate motions.Glacial Isostasy, Sea Level and Mantle Rheology, eds R. Sabadini & K. Lambeck, Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht, 1991) presume that, since the toroidal velocities are not involved in the heat transfer, the convective process develops a dynamical structure reducing the loss of kinetic energy, so that the partitioning essentially depends on the plate distribution.The constructal theory is covariant (the shape is changing in relation to the flow) as is plate tectonics.Plate motion reconstructions show that the geometry and plate motions are evolving slowly and probably maintain a lowest relative toroidal power through time.The constructal theory can be used to explain why the present-day configuration of plates is optimal for the Earth's mantle flow dynamics as the surface plate motions are indeed representative of the large-scale convective flow in the mantle.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.623
Threshold uncertainty score0.334

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Design & Nature and EcodynamicsSame topicearthquake and tectonic studiesFrench-language works237,207