MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1992755815 · doi:10.1080/00207179.2012.751628

Networked min–max model predictive control of constrained nonlinear systems with delays and packet dropouts

2013· article· en· W1992755815 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Control · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Control Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)Network packetNonlinear systemActuatorModel predictive controlController (irrigation)State (computer science)Networked control systemLyapunov functionStability (learning theory)Computer scienceChannel (broadcasting)Control (management)AlgorithmArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article investigates a class of constrained nonlinear networked control systems (NCSs) subject to external disturbances, input and state constraints and network-induced constraints. From a practical perspective, the network-induced constraints considered include the time delays and packet dropouts on both the sensor-to-controller (S-C) channel and the controller-to-actuator (C-A) channel simultaneously. The min–max model predictive control method is proposed to design the control packets by incorporating the external disturbances into the optimisation problem. Moreover, the input-to-state practical stability of the resulting nonlinear NCS is established by constructing a novel Lyapunov function. Finally, the simulation results and the comparison studies are presented to demonstrate the effectiveness and improvement of the proposed method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.952
Threshold uncertainty score0.626

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.185
Teacher spread0.182 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it