MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Standoff detection of hydroponic equipment through electromagnetic emissions

2014· article· en· W1992767612 on OpenAlexaff
Dennis Liang, David G. Michelson

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicLightning and Electromagnetic Phenomena
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRadio frequencyAnechoic chamberNoise (video)EngineeringAntenna (radio)Environmental scienceElectrical engineeringAutomotive engineeringComputer scienceTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Previous studies have demonstrated that hydroponics equipment such as ballasts used by high-pressure sodium (HPS) and metal halide (MH) lamps, especially ageing ones, emit detectable RF signals. It is, however, not yet clear whether such emissions are sufficiently strong or unique to permit standoff detection from vehicles located near or adjacent to buildings or structures that contain such equipment. With support from the Surrey Fire Service, which seeks to develop such techniques to facilitate fire safety inspections, we have sought to resolve this issue using a four-point strategy: 1) Assessment of the nature and strength of RF emissions from typical hydroponics equipment in a controlled environment, e.g., an anechoic chamber, using an Agilent PXA signal analyzer and various receiving antennas covering a range of frequency bands, 2) Assessment of the nature and strength of RF emissions from man-made and natural sources in typical urban and suburban environments using the same test and measurement equipment carried aboard a mobile test van. 3) Development of mobile antenna concepts that are capable of enhancing RF emissions from hydroponics equipment and suppressing RF emissions from other sources. 4) Development of filtering concepts that are capable of enhancing RF emissions from hydroponics equipment and suppressing RF emissions from other sources. Our results suggest that while emissions from new equipment operated in commercial or industrial environments will be difficult to detect due to the combination of very low emissions from the equipment and a high level of background noise, older and poorly maintained ballasts that are more likely to be used under unsafe circumstances are indeed prone to emit more strongly and are more easily detected in low noise residential environments and that the distinctive nature of the signals emitted by ageing ballasts lend themselves to enhanced detection in the presence of noise through suitable signal processing.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicLightning and Electromagnetic PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207