MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1992794662 · doi:10.1504/ijipt.2005.008043

Self-tuning PI rate controller for best-effort traffic with interval phase margin assignment

2005· article· en· W1992794662 on OpenAlexafffund
Yang Hong, Oliver Yang

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Internet Protocol Technology · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNetwork Traffic and Congestion Control
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity of Waterloo
KeywordsComputer scienceMargin (machine learning)Phase (matter)Phase marginInterval (graph theory)Controller (irrigation)Control theory (sociology)PID controllerPiReal-time computingMathematicsTelecommunicationsArtificial intelligencePhysicsControl (management)EngineeringControl engineeringCombinatoricsOperational amplifierBandwidth (computing)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we propose a self-tuning PI rate controller for the AQM router to support best-effort traffic in the Internet. We apply classical control theory and use phase margin in controller design that would allow the users to achieve good stability robustness of AQM control system. Our self-tuning PI rate controller will self-tune only when the system phase margin falls outside a specified interval upon dramatic change of Internet environment. Our self-tuning PI rate controller is located in the router and would calculate the advertised transmission rates for source nodes based on the instantaneous queue length of the buffer. Our simulations demonstrate that our AQM control system can adapt not only to the fluctuation of the uncontrolled traffic but also to sudden changes of Internet environment very well, thus providing the Internet with good transient behavior.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.957
Threshold uncertainty score0.845

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2005
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Internet Protocol TechnologySame topicNetwork Traffic and Congestion ControlFrench-language works237,207