MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1992812995 · doi:10.1038/sj.bjp.0704303

Glycosylation and the activation of proteinase‐activated receptor 2 (PAR<sub>2</sub>) by human mast cell tryptase

2001· article· en· W1992812995 on OpenAlexaff
Steven J. Compton, Bernard Renaux, Suranga J. Wijesuriya, Morley D. Hollenberg

Bibliographic record

VenueBritish Journal of Pharmacology · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBlood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTryptaseGlycosylationReceptorFurinMolecular biologyCell biologyChemistryBiochemistryBiologyMast cellEnzymeImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

1. Human mast cell tryptase appears to display considerable variation in activating proteinase-activated receptor 2 (PAR(2)). We found tryptase to be an inefficient activator of wild-type rat-PAR(2) (wt-rPAR(2)) and therefore decided to explore the factors that may influence tryptase activation of PAR(2). 2. Using a 20 mer peptide (P20) corresponding to the cleavage/activation sequence of wt-rPAR(2), tryptase was as efficient as trypsin in releasing the receptor-activating sequence (SLIGRL.). However, in the presence of either human-PAR(2) or wt-r PAR(2) expressing cells, tryptase could only activate PAR(2) by releasing SLIGRL from the P20 peptide, suggesting that PAR(2) expressed on the cells was protected from tryptase activation. 3. Three approaches were employed to test the hypothesis that PAR(2) receptor glycosylation restricts tryptase activation. (a) pretreatment of wt-rPAR(2) expressing cells or human embryonic kidney cells (HEK293) with vibrio cholerae neuraminidase to remove oligosaccharide sialic acid, unmasked tryptase-mediated PAR(2) activation. (b) Inhibiting receptor glycosylation in HEK293 cells with tunicamycin enabled tryptase-mediated PAR(2) activation. (c) Wt-rPAR(2) devoid of the N-terminal glycosylation sequon (PAR(2)T25(-)), but not rPAR(2) devoid of the glycosylation sequon located on extracellular loop-2 (PAR(2)T224A), was selectively and substantially (>30 fold) more sensitive to tryptase compared with the wt-rPAR(2). 4. Immunocytochemistry using antisera that specifically recognized the N-terminal precleavage sequence of PAR(2) demonstrated that tryptase released the precleavage domain from PAR(2)T25(-) but not from wt-rPAR(2). 5. Heparin : tryptase molar ratios of greater than 2 : 1 abrogated tryptase activation of PAR(2)T25(-). 6. Our results indicate that glycosylation of PAR(2) and heparin-inhibition of PAR(2) activation by tryptase could provide novel mechanisms for regulating receptor activation by tryptase and possibly other proteases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations110
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBritish Journal of PharmacologySame topicBlood Coagulation and Thrombosis MechanismsFrench-language works237,207