A Central Kinase Domain of Type I Phosphatidylinositol Phosphate Kinases Is Sufficient to Prime Exocytosis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Exocytosis, a critical process for neuronal communication and hormonal regulation, involves several distinct steps including MgATP-dependent priming (which involves the synthesis of phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate). Type I phosphatidylinositol phosphate kinases (PIPKIs) were purified biochemically as a priming factor. PIPKI consists of three domains: the N-terminal region, the central kinase domain, and the C-terminal region. Three isoforms (alpha, beta, and gamma) of PIPKI have been identified, and each is alternatively spliced at the C-terminal region. In the present study, we conducted a structure/function analysis of PIPKIs in the priming of exocytosis, and we found that recombinant PIPKIalpha and PIPKIgamma had priming activity. However, an unexpected finding of these results was that PIPKIbeta did not prime exocytosis. The N- or C-terminal region of PIPKIalpha and PIPKIgamma was not required for priming, which indicates that the central kinase domain is sufficient for this process. Alternative splicing in each isoform did not affect the isoform specificity in priming. Priming activity by isoforms is strongly correlated with their phosphatidylinositol phosphate kinase activity because PIPKIalpha and PIPKIgamma had higher kinase activity than PIPKIbeta. These results suggest that PIPKIalpha and PIPKIgamma are the critical priming factors for exocytosis; it also suggests that the levels of phosphatidylinositol phosphate kinase activity in producing phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate specify the function of PIPKI isoforms in priming.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".