Ohmic Cooking of Processed Meats and its Effects on Product Quality
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT: A basic bologna emulsion (lean and fatty pork meat, sodium chloride, sodium erythorbate, and sodium nitrite) was cooked in 1‐kg portions, either in a smokehouse (180‐min cycle; to 70 °C at core) or by ohmic heating (64 to 103 V; 3.9 °C/min to 10.3 °C/min; to 70 °C to 80 °C), and the finished products were compared for color, texture, pH, drip, Eh, and rancidity. Heating rates, final temperatures, and a 20‐min holding time had little influence on the quality of ohmic sausages. In addition, ohmic sausages were always found to be similar to smokehouse products except for texture, which was significantly softer (P > 0.05) in ohmic products but could be hardened by use of binders.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it