MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1992910038 · doi:10.1109/ceidp.2008.4772929

Influence of Temperature and Moisture on the Dielectric Response of Oil-Paper Insulation System

2008· article· en· W1992910038 on OpenAlexaff
Hélène Provencher, B. Noirhomme, Éric David

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower Transformer Diagnostics and Insulation
Canadian institutionsHydro-QuébecÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDielectric responseTransformerMaterials scienceDielectricTemperature measurementTransformer oilArrhenius equationFrequency responseMoistureTemperature coefficientActivation energyElectrical engineeringComposite materialElectronic engineeringThermodynamicsEngineeringVoltageOptoelectronicsPhysicsChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Since a few years, non-destructive techniques for assessment of power transformer insulation systems have been developed. The dielectric response in time and frequency domain is studied to determine the oil/paper insulation condition. One of the important parameters affecting the dielectric response is the temperature. On real transformer, the temperature of measurement is not controlled and is usually related to ambient temperature, therefore in order to compare measurements at different temperature it is important to study the influence of this parameter. It is well know that the temperature dependency to the response of transformer insulation follows an Arrhenius type law and that it is possible to normalize to a master curve measurement taken at different temperature. To evaluate this dependency and to model it, this study was done on transformer model with both the dielectric response in time and frequency domain with the temperature varying from 10 to 50 degC. The results allow us to model the dependency of the temperature and to calculate the activation energy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.179
Teacher spread0.174 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPower Transformer Diagnostics and InsulationFrench-language works237,207