MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1992923636 · doi:10.1080/10652460902992292

A formula for the norm of an averaging operator on weighted Lebesgue space

2009· article· en· W1992923636 on OpenAlexafffund
M. Dziri, Gord Sinnamon

Bibliographic record

VenueIntegral Transforms and Special Functions · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicDifferential Equations and Boundary Problems
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMathematicsLp spaceLebesgue integrationOperator normNorm (philosophy)Bounded functionPure mathematicsOperator (biology)Standard probability spaceClass (philosophy)Finite-rank operatorBounded operatorMultiplication operatorOperator theoryDiscrete mathematicsMathematical analysisHilbert spaceBanach space

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Members of a family of averaging operators associated with systems of partial differential operators are studied as maps on a class of weighted Lebesgue spaces. Those spaces on which the operators are bounded maps are determined and the operator norms are given precisely.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.004
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIntegral Transforms and Special FunctionsSame topicDifferential Equations and Boundary ProblemsFrench-language works237,207