MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1992931097 · doi:10.1167/13.9.1076

Neuropsychological evidence for separate shape representations in vision and touch: a study using the Judd variant of the Muller-Lyer illusion.

2013· article· en· W1992931097 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Vision · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicSpatial Neglect and Hemispheric Dysfunction
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIllusionPsychologyOptical illusionVisual agnosiaHaptic technologyStimulus (psychology)Fusiform face areaCognitive psychologyPerceptionNeuroscienceFace perceptionArtificial intelligenceComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Judd variant of the Muller-Lyer figure consists of a horizontal shaft with an arrowhead at each end; one pointing inward with respect to the shaft (forming the "head" end) and the other pointing outward (forming the "tail"). The arrowhead inducers produce a visual illusion that consists of a displacement of the perceived midpoint towards the "tail" end of the horizontal shaft. The strength of the Muller-Lyer illusion in vision is known to be correlated with the fMRI responses in the lateral occipital area (LO), a region critically involved in representing shape cues in vision. Interestingly, a Judd illusion of similar magnitude is elicited when observers explore the stimulus via touch alone. Importantly, Mancini, Bolognini, Bricolo & Vallar (2011) reported that transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) over LO reduced the strength of the Judd illusion both in vision and in touch, an effect they interpreted to reflect the critical role of LO in both visual and haptic shape representation. In contrast to the subtle effects of TMS on cognition and behavior, unilateral damage to area LO in humans produces severe deficits in visual object recognition – a condition known as visual form agnosia. Here, we investigated the magnitude of the haptic Judd illusion in a patient with visual agnosia arising from circumscribed unilateral right hemisphere LO damage. If LO is critical for shape representation via touch (as it is in vision) then unilateral damage to LO should produce a reduction in the magnitude of the haptic Judd illusion. On the contrary, our patient showed a haptic Judd illusion, the magnitude of which was greater via touch that it was in vision. Moreover, despite showing visual object agnosia, his haptic shape recognition was normal. Taken together, our neuropsychological data indicate that LO is not critical for shape recognition via touch. Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2013

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.982
Threshold uncertainty score0.170

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.116
GPT teacher head0.406
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it