MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1992943987 · doi:10.1145/1140123.1140237

Finite automata models for CS problem with binary semaphore

2006· article· en· W1992943987 on OpenAlexaff
Bogusław Schreyer, Wojciech Wawrzyński

Bibliographic record

VenueACM SIGCSE Bulletin · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSoftware Engineering Research
Canadian institutionsNipissing University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSemaphoreComputer scienceSynchronization (alternating current)AutomatonSimplicityDeterministic finite automatonFinite-state machineVisualizationTheoretical computer scienceBinary numberω-automatonQuantum finite automataAlgorithmAutomata theoryParallel computingProgramming languageMathematicsArithmeticArtificial intelligenceChannel (broadcasting)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A non-deterministic finite automata (NFA) application to a critical section (CS) problem modeling is investigated. A traditional approach to an analysis and design includes the C- like pseudo codes. This is also an educational method popular in the vast majority of texts. However, a finite automata approach offers simplicity and visualization of synchronization mechanisms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACM SIGCSE BulletinSame topicSoftware Engineering ResearchFrench-language works237,207