Prolonged Exercise Following Diuretic-Induced Hypohydration Effects on Fluid and Electrolyte Hormones
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To investigate the hypothesis that a reduction in plasma volume (PV) induced by diuretic administration would result in an increase in the fluid and electrolyte hormonal response to exercise, ten untrained males (VO(2) peak = 3.96 +/- 0.14 l/min) performed 60 min of cycle ergometry at 61 % VO(2) peak twice. The test was carried out once under control conditions (CON) (placebo) and once after 4 days of diuretic administration (DIU) (Novotriamazide; 100 mg triamterene and 50 mg hydrochlorothiazide). Calculated resting PV decreased by 14.6 +/- 3.3 % (p < 0.05) with DIU. No difference in plasma osmolality was observed between conditions. For the hormones measured, differences (p < 0.05) between conditions at rest were noted for plasma renin activity (PRA) (0.62 +/- 0.09 vs. 5.61 +/- 0.94 ng/ml/h), angiotensin I (ANG 1) (0.26 +/- 0.03 vs. 0.56 +/- 0.08 ng/ml), aldosterone (ALD) (143 +/- 14 vs. 1603 +/- 302 pg/ml), arginine vasopressin (AVP) (4.13 +/- 1.1 vs. 9.58 +/- 1.6 pg/ml) and atrial natriuretic peptide (alpha-ANP) (11.5 +/- 2.8 vs. 6.33 +/- 1.0 pg/ml). The exercise resulted in increases (p < 0.05) in PRA, ANG I, ALD, AVP, alpha-ANP. DIU led to higher levels of PRA, ANG I, and ALD (p < 0.05) and lower levels of alpha-ANP (p < 0.05) compared to CON. Arginine vasopressin was not affected by the loss of PV. For the catecholamines--norepinephrine (NE) and epinephrine (EPI)--only NE was higher during exercise with DIU compared to CON (p < 0.05). For PRA and ALD, the higher levels observed during exercise with DIU could be explained both by higher resting levels and a greater increase during exercise itself. For ANG I and NE, the effect of DIU only manifested itself during exercise. In contrast, the lower alpha-ANP observed during exercise with DIU was due to the lower resting levels. These results support the hypotheses that hypohydration leads to alterations in the secretion of all of the fluid and electrolyte hormones with the exception of AVP. The specific mechanisms of these alterations remain unclear, but appear to be related directly to the decrease in PV.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".