MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Cross-Disciplinary Mixing and Modeling Strategies in the Study of Russia and Russians

2004· article· en· W1992968639 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ronald O. Richards

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Slavonic Papers · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEastern European Communism and Reforms
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDisciplineCross disciplinaryGermanPoliticsField (mathematics)SociologyEpistemologyPerspective (graphical)HistorySocial scienceLinguisticsLawPolitical scienceComputer scienceArtPhilosophyMathematicsVisual arts

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This volume is a compilation of papers from the conference entitled Kultur, Sprache, held at the Wirtschaftuniversitat Wien in December of 1999. Thirty of the papers given during this conference are represented here, twenty written in German, nine in Russian, and one in English. The title words notwithstanding, the topics covered by these articles are hardly restricted to questions of culture, language or economics. While those three disciplines predominate, these articles also delve into questions of sociology, politics, philosophy, art, geography, biology, and history, borrowing and mixing quite liberally from various academic areas. What is striking is the extent to which many of these writers feel free to step outside the investigative media typical for their field and to employ the constructs, theories, and filters of one academic discipline to the examination of phenomena associated with a different discipline. When done badly, this leads simply to specious analogs and awkward comparisons, but when done well, this forced and jarring shift in perspective, not unlike Brecht's V-Effekt or the ostranenie of the Russian Formalists, can take us a step closer to a reality otherwise obscured by the comfortable routine of the usual methods of analysis. While there are individual examples of the aforementioned clumsiness, for the most part the many articles of this volume engage in such scholarly cross-pollination with a marked degree of success. Since it is not possible in reviewing a volume with so many articles to provide an in-depth review of each article, we will instead attempt to find common themes and in so doing provide a profile for the entire volume, touching on as many of the articles as possible.The question of money and language is central to a number of the contributions. In the volume's opening article Von der Sprache des Geldes zur Schrift der Assignaten: Prolegomena zu einer russischen Mediengeschichte des 18. Jahrhunderts Jurij Murasov examines the close relationship between paper currency and the written word, noting that, in contrast to barter transactions and spoken communication, respectively, they operate with signs and symbols, forming a symbolic unity between that which is absent and that which is present. Thus, human speech, captured in the form of writing, can free one from the need to be present in order to effect communication, while currency, as an abstract representation of goods and property, facilitates the easier exchange of wealth and goods, thereby opening up new possibilities in trade and economics. By removing temporal and spatial restrictions, both information and wealth become not only more portable, but also more quantifiable, in the case of the latter allowing time to figure in profit and loss calculations, with clear implications for concepts such as simple and compound interest rates.Dmitri Zakharine's Okonomie des Ausdrucks: Zum Wandel der russischen Konversationskultur im 18.-19. Jahrhundert begins the analysis of the relationship between money and writing by acknowledging the postmodernist take on the adage that money enslaves and language liberates, namely the postmodernist insistence that language also can be seen as enslaving in so far as it has a limiting function. He draws parallels between money and speech, on the one hand, and credit on the other, noting, as does Murasov, their symbolic nature vis-a-vis that which they represent. He notes also the use of falling intonation and other auditory phenomena (coughing, sighing, swallowing, etc.) as indicators of worth, and highlights the connections between semantic drift in language and the value drift sometimes seen in currency. In commenting on the manifestation of national character in language, he juxtaposes the language etiquette of France with the lack thereof in Germany (with the famous quote attributed to Goethe Im Deutschen lugt man, wenn man hoflich ist,) claiming that the French use the empty compliment as symbolic capital, as opposed to the Germans, for whom ich kusse Ihnen die Hand is nothing by an empty gesture. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.628
Threshold uncertainty score0.742

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Slavonic PapersSame topicEastern European Communism and ReformsFrench-language works237,207