MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1992970170 · doi:10.1109/tsg.2014.2302396

An Optimal Energy Storage Control Strategy for Grid-connected Microgrids

2014· article· en· W1992970170 on OpenAlexaff
Pawel Malysz, Shahin Sirouspour, Ali Emadi

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Smart Grid · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrogrid Control and Optimization
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematical optimizationEnergy storageComputer scienceRenewable energyEnergy managementDemand responseSmoothingSmart gridGridElectricityElectricity generationEnergy (signal processing)Power (physics)EngineeringMathematicsElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents an online optimal energy/power control method for the operation of energy storage in grid-connected electricity microgrids. The approach is based on a mixed-integer-linear-program optimization formulated over a rolling horizon window, considering predicted future electricity usage and renewable energy generation. Performance objectives include electricity usage cost, battery operation costs, and utility oriented goals related to the peak demand and load smoothing. A robust counterpart formulation of the optimization problem is also proposed to handle uncertainty in energy demand/generation prediction in a computationally efficient way. Further reduction in the computations is achieved by employing variable time steps and relaxing binary constraints. A series of simulations demonstrate the effectiveness of various features of the proposed energy/power management methodology in different scenarios.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations239
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Smart GridSame topicMicrogrid Control and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207