MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1992979462 · doi:10.1080/08827500306893

Nickel sulphide smelting and electrorefining practice: A review

2002· review· en· W1992979462 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueMineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Review · 2002
Typereview
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMetal Extraction and Bioleaching
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaNordion (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectrowinningNickelSmeltingMetallurgyRefining (metallurgy)FerroalloyPyrometallurgyRaw materialMaterials scienceEnvironmental scienceChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nickel in the form of cathodes, rounds, powders, and salts is well recognized as a useful commodity in domestic industries and/or export. It is shipped as concentrates, mixed sulphides, and ferronickel. Today, there are only a limited number of major and minor producers of this important metal, which is employed worldwide in a multitude of commercial and residential applications. Traditionally, nickel and associated metal values are recovered from ore feedstock by proven mineral processing, smelting, and refining processes. Typical host minerals contain other base metals, such as copper, cobalt, and noble metals consisting of gold, silver, and OPMs (otherprecious metals). Although sulphide-bearing ores such as those found in Canada and Russia will likely serve as a long-term source of this nonferrous material, the future trend is expected to involve laterite processing, which represents about 70% of the world's known nickel resources. The authors are aware of seven nickel refineries (ie, electrorefining) on a global basis dedicated to the production of class I primary nickel products. The supply and demand of pure and high-grade nickel products during the past decade has been erratic and subject to wide fluctuations in delivered price. This article describes theestablished industrial processes for recovery of nickel originating from sulphidic sources. Details of smelting and refining practice are provided for the three largest nickel producers. For completeness, other extractionprocesses involving a mixed sulphide, pellets from the carbonyl process, nickel powders, and briquettes are noted in the compendium of nickel processing practice, which includes pyrometallurgical principles. This paper lists the 47 pyrometallurgical operations worldwide which are mainly dedicated to the production of class II nickel products (nickel oxide products and utility nickel), nickel matte, and granules. The theme of the nickel biography is to provide a full extractive metallurgy synopsis rather than the reader reviewing numerous authors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.715
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.344
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it