Du matérialisme à l’immatérialisme : le problème âme-corps dans la philosophie clandestine
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Parmi l’ensemble des manuscrits philosophiques clandestins à notre disposition, la grande majorité des textes adopte une position matérialiste quant au rapport entre l’âme et le corps. Cette position est souvent défendue à partir d’une critique du dualisme cartésien dont on mentionne les difficultés qui ressortissent à l’union improbable de deux substances ontologiquement différentes. Mais cette lecture n’épuise pas l’ensemble des réactions nées des difficultés du dualisme cartésien. À cet égard, l’étude des Réflexions morales et métaphysiques sur les connaissances de l’homme permet de complexifier l’analyse. De fait, ce manuscrit cherche à tracer une voie médiane entre matérialisme et idéalisme d’où découle une métaphysique proprement originale, cherchant à réconcilier l’idéalisme de Malebranche et le panthéisme de Spinoza, et témoignant par là de la richesse et de la nouveauté de certaines réflexions clandestines.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.038 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".