Évaluation d'une visite virtuelle pré-opératoire pour parents et enfants
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Un hôpital pédiatrique canadien offre une visite virtuelle pré-opératoire sur son site internet. Une étude descriptive a évalué cette visite en termes d’utilisation, d’efficacité et d’utilité. La visite a été utilisée par 49.6 % des 123 familles. Les enfants de ces familles ont démontré une augmentation significative des connaissances du temps 1 (clinique pré-opératoire) au temps 2 (jour de la chirurgie). Les enfants et les adolescents n’ayant pas utilisé la visite se sont dits plus anxieux la journée de la chirurgie mais pas de manière significative. Il n’y a eu aucun changement significatif chez les parents. L’internet est un outil utile dans la préparation des familles mais ne peut remplacer une interaction directe. D’autres recherches sont nécessaires pour évaluer l’impact de ce type de préparation sur la qualité des soins et la récupération de l’enfant.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.016 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".