MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1992995306 · doi:10.1159/000076771

Physical Function and Health Status among Seniors with and without a Fear of Falling

2004· article· en· W1992995306 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueGerontology · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicBalance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFear of fallingBalance (ability)Quality of life (healthcare)PsychologyPhysical activityGerontologyMedicineInjury preventionPoison controlPhysical therapy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Fear of falling (FF) is pervasive among older people and is an independent risk factor for decreased mobility and loss of quality of life. Although it is a serious health concern, little is known about the severity of the physical and health-related deficits in high-functioning fearful seniors. OBJECTIVE: This study examined the physical correlates of FF in community-dwelling seniors in relation to their non-fearful counterparts and also explored the relevance of recent fall history. SUBJECTS: Twenty-five volunteers who stated that they had curtailed their activities due to a FF and who reported themselves to be healthy participated. Non-fearful, age- and gender-matched subjects were also recruited and served as a comparison group. METHODS: This cross-sectional study had participants come to the laboratory on one occasion for about 1.5 h. Limits of balance stability, walking speed, and lower limb muscle strength were measured in random order. In addition, the SF-36, the Activities-specific Balance Confidence (ABC) scale and the Human Activity Profile questionnaires were completed to provide measures of heath status, FF and activity levels, respectively. RESULTS: Subjects with a FF had lower ABC scores (69.8 +/- 10.2) than controls (90.2 +/- 7.9; p < 0.001), and although they reported activity curtailment, the groups presented similar activity profiles (p > 0.05). Balance ability was not compromised in seniors with a FF, although their walking speed was slower than that of control subjects (p < 0.004). Lower limb weakness was significant in the FF group, which also reported low physical health. Perceived physical health, activity and hip flexor torque in combination accounted for almost 62% of the variance in ABC scores. Secondary analysis of the data from the FF group revealed a tendency for those who had fallen in the past year to restrict their limits of stability compared to those who had not fallen; though generally the effect sizes were small to moderate. CONCLUSIONS: The marked deficits in strength and health status found among seniors living independently in the community, who are in good health, but report being fearful of falling underscores the seriousness of FF as a potential health risk factor in the well elderly.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.557

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.364
Teacher spread0.330 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it