Blood acylcarnitine levels in normal newborns and heterozygotes for medium‐chain acyl‐CoA dehydrogenase deficiency: A relationship between genotype and biochemical phenotype?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Patients with medium-chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenase (MCAD) deficiency are unable to metabolize medium-chain fatty acids. Affected patients display a characteristic acylcarnitine profile when blood spots are collected after birth and analysed by tandem mass spectrometry. To determine the potential risk of metabolic decompensation in newborns with elevations of diagnostic metabolites (octanoylcarnitine>0.3, but <1 micromol/L), we investigated the relationship between octanoylcarnitine (C8) concentration in neonatal blood spots and the 985A>G MCAD genotype. Octanoylcarnitine values from 7140 newborns' blood spots were sorted. The highest C8 was approximately 0.7 micromol/L, which is below the range in classical MCAD deficiency. Samples with C8 levels above 0.25 micromol/L (group C) represented 1.4% of the total. Values between 0.05 and 0.25 micromol/L (group B) made up 87.8% of the total; 10.8% of the samples had C8 values less than 0.05 micromol/L (group A). One hundred samples from each group were selected at random and genomic DNA was amplified by PCR and analysed for the presence of the 985A>G mutation. The analysed samples from groups A and B were all homozygous normal. The 100 samples from group C contained 26 samples that were heterozygous for the 985A>G mutation. These findings indicated that the frequency distribution of heterozygotes is not random within this population. Group C was further divided into C1, the 26 heterozygotes, and C2, the remaining 74 newborns in group C. In group C1 only 2 (8%) were in the 'high-risk' group characterized by either low birth weight or requiring admission to the neonatal intensive care unit. In contrast, 28 (38%) from C2 had low birth weight or were in the neonatal intensive care unit. In our dataset, C8/C2 and C8/C12 ratios were also significantly elevated in both groups C1 and C2 compared to controls (group B). In contrast to what others have reported, the ratio of C8/C10 did not differentiate the group B controls from heterozygotes or other patients in metabolic distress (group C2), but were lower than those seen in classic MCAD or mild MCAD deficiency.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".