MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1993077702 · doi:10.1159/000159170

Potentiation of Acetylcholine-lnduced Responses in Freshly Isolated Rabbit Aortic Endothelial Cells

2008· article· en· W1993077702 on OpenAlexaff
Xiaodong Wang, Winifred Chu, C. van Breemen

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Vascular Research · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicReceptor Mechanisms and Signaling
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAcetylcholineRabbit (cipher)Long-term potentiationLagomorphaInternal medicineMedicinePharmacologyChemistryEndocrinology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Acetylcholine (ACh)-induced membrane hyperpolarization was studied in freshly isolated endothelial cells from rabbit aorta. Ten microM ACh induced transient hyperpolarization due to the opening of Ca(2+)-sensitive K+ channels, sensitive to TEA and charybdotoxin (CTX). The membrane potential response was accompanied by an increase in intracellular Ca2+ [Ca2+]i. Pretreatment of endothelial cells with 20 microM ATP, 0.2 microM bradykinin or 0.1 microM platelet-aggregating factor, which induced either a transient hyperpolarization or no response, changed the subsequent ACh-induced response to a large maintained hyperpolarization. This sustained membrane hyperpolarization was also due to the opening of Ca(2+)-activated K+ channels as confirmed by CTX and TEA blockade, and was related to elevated [Ca2+]i measured by fura-2 fluorescence. Pertussis toxin blocked potentiation, indicating involvement of a G protein. The linkage to receptor-operated Ca2+ (ROC)-entry was suggested by observations that the maintained hyperpolarization during potentiation was dependent on extracellular Ca2+ and was abolished by the ROC blockers SKF-96365 and Ni2+. Inhibition of the Ca2+ pump of the endoplasmic reticulum mimicked the potentiating effect of the agonists. The results suggest that crosstalk between the agonists in endothelial cells involves Ca2+ movements and that this crosstalk is important for the generation of endothelial secretions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.328
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Vascular ResearchSame topicReceptor Mechanisms and SignalingFrench-language works237,207